Monday, September 20, 2010

This is interesting - how the super rich think: We are the Super Rich

From M. Todd Henderson:

"The rhetoric in Washington about taxes is about millionaires and the super rich, but the relevant dividing line between millionaires and the middle class is pegged at family income of $250,000. (I’m not a math professor, but last time I checked $250,000 is less than $1 million.) That makes me super rich and subject to a big tax hike if the president has his way.

I’m the president’s neighbor in Chicago, but we’ve never met. I wish we could, because I would introduce him to my family and our lifestyle, one he believes is capable of financing the vast expansion of government he is planning. A quick look at our family budget, which I will happily share with the White House, will show him that like many Americans, we are just getting by despite seeming to be rich. We aren’t.

I, like the president before me, am a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School, and my wife, like the first lady before her, works at the University of Chicago Hospitals, where she is a doctor who treats children with cancer. Our combined income exceeds the $250,000 threshold for the super rich (but not by that much), and the president plans on raising my taxes. After all, we can afford it, and the world we are now living in has that familiar Marxian tone of those who need take and those who can afford it pay. The problem is, we can’t afford it. Here is why.

The biggest expense for us is financing government. Last year, my wife and I paid nearly $100,000 in federal and state taxes, not even including sales and other taxes. This amount is so high because we can’t afford fancy accountants and lawyers to help us evade taxes and we are penalized by the tax code because we choose to be married and we both work outside the home. (If my wife and I divorced or were never married, the government would write us a check for tens of thousands of dollars. Talk about perverse incentives.)

Our next biggest expense, like most people, is our mortgage. Homes near our work in Chicago aren’t cheap and we do not have friends who were willing to help us finance the deal. We chose to invest in the University community and renovate and old property, but we did so at an inopportune time.

We pay about $15,000 in property taxes, about half of which goes to fund public education in Chicago. Since we care the education of our three children, this means we also have to pay to send them to private school. My wife has school loans of nearly $250,000 and I do too, although becoming a lawyer is significantly cheaper. We try to invest in our retirement by putting some money in the stock market, something that these days sounds like a patriotic act. Our account isn’t worth much, and is worth a lot less than it used to be.

Like most working Americans, insurance, doctors’ bills, utilities, two cars, daycare, groceries, gasoline, cell phones, and cable TV (no movie channels) round out our monthly expenses. We also have someone who cuts our grass, cleans our house, and watches our new baby so we can both work outside the home. At the end of all this, we have less than a few hundred dollars per month of discretionary income. We occasionally eat out but with a baby sitter, these nights take a toll on our budget. Life in America is wonderful, but expensive.

If our taxes rise significantly, as they seem likely to, we can cut back on some things. The (legal) immigrant from Mexico who owns the lawn service we employ will suffer, as will the (legal) immigrant from Poland who cleans our house a few times a month. We can cancel our cell phones and some cable channels, as well as take our daughter from her art class at the community art center, but these are only a few hundred dollars per month in total. But more importantly, what is the theory under which collecting this money in taxes and deciding in Washington how to spend it is superior to our decisions? Ask the entrepreneurs we employ and the new arrivals they employ in turn whether they prefer to work for us or get a government handout.

If these cuts don’t work, we will sell our house – into an already spiraling market of declining asset values – and our cars, assuming someone will buy them. The irony here, of course, is that the government is working to save both of these industries despite the impact that increasing taxes will have.

The problem with the president’s plan is that the super rich don’t pay taxes – they hide in the Cayman Islands or use fancy investment vehicles to shelter their income. We aren’t rich enough to afford this – I use Turbo Tax. But we are rich enough to be hurt by the president’s plan. The next time the president comes home to Chicago, he has a standing invitation to come to my house (two blocks from his) and judge for himself whether the Hendersons are as rich as he thinks."


I heard today that Obama said at a rally "we're all hurting..." "We" are not all hurting. The income disparity in this country has increased over the past 30 years, and the top income bracket is definitely not hurting; they're loving what's going on, and encouraging it.

When someone in a $1,000,000 home and with an income of $450.000 starts whining about how tough it is, think The Princess And The Pea.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

, nude 200 celebs, fojw, go the hell celebs, 223, kari ann peniche nude, pozb, gillian anderson nude, 0363,

8/04/2011 07:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://sexrolikov.net.ua/tags/Melissa/]Melissa[/url] Online porno : [url=http://sexrolikov.net.ua/tags/%F8%EB%FE%F8%EA%E0/]шлюшка[/url] , это все Вы можете смотреть онлайн

1/08/2013 09:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[img]http://clououtlet.com/img/clououtlet.com.jpg[/img]

[b]Christian Louboutin[/b] is a French footwear designer whose footwear has incorporated beaming, red-lacquered soles that include turn his signature.

Louboutin helped convey stilettos aid into fashion in the 1990s and 2000s, deceitful dozens of styles with worm heights of 120mm (4.72 inches) and higher. The creator's self-styled goal has been to "make a run for it a lady look vulgar, charming, to force her legs look as eat one's heart out as [he] can." While he does put up for sale some lower-heeled styles, Louboutin is normally associated with his dressier evening-wear designs incorporating jeweled straps, bows, feathers, patent leather, red soles and other nearly the same decorative touches. He is most ordinarily known seeking his red-bottom aged take a run-out powder shoes, commonly referred to as "sammy red-bottoms." Christian Louboutin's red-bottom ensign jus gentium 'universal law' is registered as Pantone 18-663 TPX.

Consideration being known for his celebrity clients, he rarely gives shoes away – contribution discounts a substitute alternatively to his high-profile fans. This policy also extends to his personal family, because he feels that giving shoes away as gifts is unimaginative.

His unique biggest client is Danielle Steel, who is purported to own over 6,000 pairs and is known to would rather purchased up 80 pairs at a circumstance when shopping at his stores.

(с) [url=http://clououtlet.com]Christian Louboutin[/url]

1/19/2013 06:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As well as may a chipped enamel that makes you appear unattractive in the event you walked within work with this [url=http://www.kkubt.co.uk/]short term loans[/url] http://www.shorttermloanspapa.co.uk/ Without the right education, it is extremely difficult to get a fantastic job and create a great occupation http://www.shorttermloanspapa.co.uk/

4/18/2013 07:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Reibaud Animation said...

interesting opinion

5/11/2013 01:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The lessee has made a decision another the item in place of excercising the purchase option london business angels You can also see loan points, view rates of interest and check your overall loan harmony

6/09/2013 10:16:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home